« Metadata problems at Google Books | Main | Google's metadata questions - they're our questions also »

Tuesday, September 08, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


Yes, GIGO is the problem with machine-manipulated data with little or no human involvement. Nunberg's comments on the metadata problems with Google Books were excellent and thoroughly documented. He made some mistakes about the sources of some of the errosr, but the overall point that Google was not being responsible with its evaluation of metadata was good. To their credit, Orwant and other members of the the Google project seem to be taking concrete measures to change things. I think this is one of those rare situations in which criticism is taken seriously and improvements made.

Matt Ostercamp

Thanks for posting this Christine. I thought the Orwant comment was really helpful for answering some of my own questions about how they are building Google Books.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Scope of blog

  • The focus of this blog is the future of cataloging and metadata in libraries.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2014

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    


    Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)

    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 04/2007