The moment of truth is here. Deanna Marcum has just responded [pdf] to On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control.
« Palinet symposium on the future of cataloging | Main | More future of cataloging conversation... »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Well, I didn't give it a really thorough reading...but the thing I had the biggest problem with in the report, the suspension of RDA, clearly LC is not going to go along with, so I'm ok with the response.
I certainly think RDA seems to have problems, and I don't know that it will be perfect, or the right answer, but I think that it is definitely still worth pursuing.
Posted by: arkham | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 02:21 PM
I agree. I'm behind continued RDA development also. Now that I'm working with mostly non-MARC formats (I'm only working on one project that's using MARCXML and MARC 21) the need for a new content standard is very apparent to me. I have to say that I love AACR2 and I'm sure I'll refer back to it as a reference. AACR2 has a coherent structure and logic to it. I have a particular fondness for my dogeared library school copy of the 1988 revision with penciled in LCRI rule numbers!
Posted by: Chris Schwartz | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 02:39 PM