« LC Subject Cataloging and the Open Library | Main | Upcoming Posts: RDA Takes FRBR Seriously »

Tuesday, August 14, 2007


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I am looking forward to reading these books too. I'm surprised to see you write that you have a "love/hate relationship with FRBR." I do hope that you'll spell out what you have in mind in a future post--I'd be really interested in your thoughts on the pros and cons of FRBR.

Chris Schwartz

What I mean by my "love/hate relationship with FRBR" is that it's a good conceptual model for online catalog displays, but I think it's hard to translate FRBR concepts to bibliographic record creation (the way we created them now). A cataloger is using an "item" to describe a "manifestation" and we will use things like uniform titles or notes to bring out the "work" or "expression" aspects, but the FRBR model as it is currently being applied to the draft of the new content standard, RDA, is adding a layer of conceptual complexity that the practical side of cataloging has never had to deal with before. This might be a good thing, I don't know.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Scope of blog

  • The focus of this blog is the future of cataloging and metadata in libraries.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2014

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    


    Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)

    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 04/2007