« More Resources on Upgrading Catalogers' Skills | Main | Roy Tennant on Professional Development of Librarians »

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jonathan Rochkind

Good find. Sure, patrons, but we don't even have the technology, culture, and policies to let LIBRARIANS improve and correct the metadata easily and quickly, do we? Depending on the type of metadata we are talking about, it involves some combination of a long and expensive training and certification process, and submitting a narrative request for correction to some Higher Power. If the correction/improvement is actually made, then most of our systems will still require manual, complicated, and expensive intervention to actually pick up those changes, at some later date.

This is problematic and inefficient.

Chris Schwartz

Jonathan, I have to agree with you. One of my goals this year is to apply for OCLC enhance mode for books and serials, so that I can improve records that I'm working on in WorldCat. So, I'm going to gather up some examples of my original cataloging in both formats. Everything you say is true about the current metadata/systems culture that we are working in. Like you've said before we're dealing with a broken system.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Scope of blog

  • The focus of this blog is the future of cataloging and metadata in libraries.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2014

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    

    Categories

    Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)

    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 04/2007