There's been a lot of posts last week noting the arrival of the new Library of Congress Blog. The LC blog author is Matt Raymond, the Library's Director of Communications. Catalogers might find this post interesting: "Is Blogging Serializing?" Here's an excerpt:
"I got an email this morning from a colleague in the Office of
Communications, who said that she was speaking to our “guru of ISSN
numbers.” Here is the upshot:
Today she told me that after much debate, catalogers had
decided that corporate blogs published regularly are in fact serial
publications and therefore should have an ISSN number. The Library
should be a model for all catalogers, she said. She promised to read
and assess your blog and communicate further. Many bloggers have been
requesting ISSN numbers. You may already have an ISSN number." (Emphasis mine)
I can't help but jump in with my two cents here. I really think blogs are, like most websites, integrating resources, not serials. Any serials 101 class will tell you that a serial needs to have discrete issues that remain distinct. On the other hand, an integrating resource has updates that get integrated into the whole. I guess you could consider blog posts "discrete issues"?
The comments for this post provide a lively debate about whether or not blogs should be assigned ISSN numbers. Also, here's interesting quote from the comments about the possibility of an LC cataloging blog. Matt states:
"I have to admit that much of this conversation is over my head, which
is why I hope librarian-specific and/or cataloger-specific blogs are
among the first we can launch once the institution-wide blogging policy
is in place." (Emphasis mine)
I would surely welcome an LC cataloger blog! Come on you guys get started!
Via Notatu Dignum
Recent Comments