« Let's mashup MARC metadata before moving to the Cloud! | Main | LC's MARC record production study: surveys now available »

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jodi Schneider

I'd make a distinction between subject headings (themselves) and subject-heading-powered display (e.g. "more subject info").

Thanks for the usability shout-out! I've yet to read the report, but looking forward to sitting down with it sometime.

Chris

Hi Jodi,

Good distinction. I was going to add that "more subject information" does not necessarily mean precooordinated Library of Congress subject headings. It could refer to tags, etc. No matter, good subject metadata is necessary in whatever form.

arkham

It's pretty sad that web usability and information architecture can be considered "new areas of study". I studied both in grad school (ok, I only finished in '06, but still, in web terms, that's forever).

A lot of the problems with our catalogs could be fixed by really applying usability and IA...unfortunately, being stuck with an ILS vendor's OPAC makes that really difficult. (and WorldCat Local will not solve the problem)

Heidi Hoerman

I've made a quick comment about this over at http://future4catalogers.wordpress.com/. Thanx, Christine.

Chris

Thanks, arkham. I've modified the post. Yes, I agree, not exactly "new."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Scope of blog

  • The focus of this blog is the future of cataloging and metadata in libraries.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2014

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    

    Categories

    Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)

    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 04/2007