« Helpful ideas for batchloading vendor records | Main | RDA: Resource Description and Access - more delays »

Monday, August 18, 2008

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Irvin Flack

There's an irony in MG laying down the theoretical model for RDA, given his recent comments:
"FRBR may have some merit as a way of looking at the theory of cataloguing—it has little as a foundational document for creating a cataloguing code. Never mind that the structure of bibliographic records set out in AACR2/ISBD is well established, accepted by scholars and other catalogue users for decades, and with minor flaws in concept and expression that could easily be corrected—it works in practice, but does it work in theory?"
'RDA: the coming cataloging debacle' http://www.slc.bc.ca/rda1007.pdf

Chris Schwartz

I think Michael Gorman falls squarely into the camp of those who feel there was no need to develop a new cataloging code.

I'd love to hear more as to why he thinks FRBR "has little as a foundational document for creating a cataloguing code." I've been wondering for a long time why he's been such a absent voice in the future of cataloging conversation.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Scope of blog

  • The focus of this blog is the future of cataloging and metadata in libraries.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    July 2014

    Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3 4 5
    6 7 8 9 10 11 12
    13 14 15 16 17 18 19
    20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    27 28 29 30 31    

    Categories

    Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)

    Blog powered by Typepad
    Member since 04/2007