« Future of cataloging debate - any thoughts? | Main | Deanna Marcum's response to the LC working group report »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c557f53ef00e552a9f0338834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Palinet symposium on the future of cataloging:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Christine,
What bums me out as I read about it is that it seems that the more "conservative" voices were not there. Whether they were invited or not of course I can't say, if they weren't, that would be disappointing.
And as much as I'd like to consider you as a good person who could represent those kinds of views (like Mann, Yee, Gorman, etc.), as you yourself said you are on the other "side" now (well, I don't think you said it quite like that... :) )
Thanks Christine,
Nathan
Posted by: Nathan | Friday, May 30, 2008 at 03:47 PM
Hi Nathan, Hey! I've been reading David Bade's new book "Responsible Librarianship" :) I'm still trying to listen to all the voices in the debate. But, you're right, in my current work life, I'm "on other side." But I would argue that a lot of traditional cataloging can be brought to bear on non-MARC metadata creation and digital objects. Of course, this is just a working thesis--I'm way too new to metadata librarianship to know where I'm going to end up :)
Posted by: Chris Schwartz | Friday, May 30, 2008 at 04:04 PM