The moment of truth is here. Deanna Marcum has just responded [pdf] to On the Record: Report of The Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control.
« Palinet symposium on the future of cataloging | Main | More future of cataloging conversation... »
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c557f53ef00e5529412428833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Deanna Marcum's response to the LC working group report:
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Search
- The focus of this blog is the use of XQuery for digital collections development in libraries.
January 2012
Recent Posts
- Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- Interesting post: CodeYear Catalogers
- XQuery for library metadata: no. 4
- XQuery for library metadata: no. 3
- Controlled vocabularies: more than just words
- ALA 2011: Some RDA news
- From catalogers to information ninjas?
- MARBI and the future of the MARC format?
- RDA Test Coordinating Committee: full report now available
- RDA implementation decison
Recent Comments
- LINDSAYJaime on Content curation and cataloging
- BRIANA20HOOVER on Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- Christine Schwartz on Interesting post: CodeYear Catalogers
- Steve Casburn on Interesting post: CodeYear Catalogers
- Christine Schwartz on Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- Nancy Adams on Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- Christine Schwartz on Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- arkham on Cataloging Futures takes a new direction
- joy on The importance of findability and the library catalog
- Christine Schwartz on RDA implementation decison
Categories
- balisageConference09
- AACR2
- Acquisitions
- ALA
- ALA2007
- ala2008
- ALA2010
- ALA2011
- ALAMW08
- ALAMW09
- ALAMW11
- ALAMW2008
- ALAMW2009
- ALAMW2011
- ALCTS
- American Library Association
- Archives
- ARL
- Arlene Taylor
- Authority control
- authority work
- Automatic metadata generation
- Barbara Tillett
- Batchloading
- Bibliographic control
- Bibliographic records
- Bibliographic utilities
- biblios.net
- Blogs
- Books
- Cataloging
- Cataloging education
- cataloging humor
- cataloging tools
- Cataloguing
- Cataloguing education
- cataloguing tools
- Classification
- Code4Lib
- Code4Lib2008
- Code4Lib2009
- Conferences
- CONSER
- Controlled vocabularies
- Curation
- David Bade
- DCMI
- Descriptive metadata
- Diane Hillmann
- Digital culture
- Digital libraries
- Digital Library Federation
- Digital objects
- Dublin Core
- Ebooks
- Embedded metadata
- ER diagrams
- Faviki
- Findability
- FRAD
- FRBR
- FRSAD
- full-text searching
- Future of cataloging
- Future of cataloguing
- Future of libraries
- HTML
- ICOLC
- IFLA
- ILS
- Information architecture
- Interlibrary loan
- International collaboration
- Internet Archive
- interoperability
- Janet Swan Hill
- JISC
- Karen Calhoun
- Karen Coyle
- LCSH
- Libary catalogs
- LibLime
- Library catalogs
- Library of Congress
- Library of Congress classification
- Library of Congress subject headings
- Library school
- Library Thing
- Linked data
- LITA
- LYRASIS
- MARBI
- MARC
- MARC 21
- MarkLogic
- Martha Yee
- Metadata
- metadata aggregation
- Metadata crosswalks
- metadata humor
- metadata librarianship
- Metadata schemas
- metadata workflows
- METS
- Michael Gorman
- micro-blogging
- MOBIUS
- MODS
- NDSL Metadata Registry
- NISO
- OCLC
- ONIX
- Ontology
- OPAC
- Open data
- Open Library
- Open source
- OWL
- Patrick Wilson
- photo metadata
- Professional development
- programming
- Quote of the day
- R2 Consulting
- Rare book cataloging
- RDA
- RDA data model
- RDA Online
- RDA Toolkit
- RDF
- Reading
- Reference librarians
- Renee Register
- RESTful Web Services
- RLG
- Roy Tennant
- Scrum
- Semantic Web
- Serials cataloging
- shared data
- SKOS
- SkyRiver
- SOAP
- Special collections cataloging
- Standards
- Tag clouds
- Tagging
- Tags
- Talis
- Technical services
- TEI
- Theological librarianship
- Thomas Mann
- Topic maps
- URI
- User behavior
- Watson
- Web
- Web 2.0
- Web 3.0
- Web usability
- Webcasts
- WGFBC
- Wikipedia
- Wikis
- WoGroFuBiCo
- WorldCat Local
- XML
- XQuery
Future of Cataloging: Key Resources (to May 2008)
- Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California: Final Report: December 2005
- White Paper on the Future of Cataloging at Indiana University, January 15, 2006
- Deanna B. Marcum, The Future of Cataloging, January 16, 2005
- Karen Calhoun, The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools: Final Report, March 17, 2006
- Library of Congress Professional Guild, Future of Cataloging (various articles including Thomas Mann's critique of the Calhoun Report)
- Library of Congress, Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control
- RDA: Resource Description and Access website
- Conference on Bibliographic Control in the New Millennium (Library of Congress), 2000
- Catalogers Learning Workshop (CLW)
- Standards (The Library of Congress)
- Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI)
- ONIX (Online Information Exchange)
- Resource Description Framework (RDF) / W3C Semantic Web Activity
- Karen Calhoun, Being a Librarian: Metadata and Metadata Specialists in the Twenty-first Century, December 2004
- PennTags /tag/cataloging
- ALCTS and the Future of Bibliographic Control: Challenges, Actions, and Values, January 4, 2007
- futurelib wiki
- IFLA, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
- Blogs About Catalogs and Cataloging
- Minerva Shelved, Cataloger Call [blog post], April 5, 2007
- Planet Cataloging
- MARC Content Designation Utilization » MCDU Home
- IFLA, Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model (FRAD)
- Karen Calhoun, "Economics and Organization of Bibliographic Data": Response to Background Paper, July 9, 2007
- Diane I. Hillmann, Adding New Skills to our Skillset, July 2007
- Martha M. Yee, Will The Response Of The Library Profession To The Internet Be Self-Immolation? July 2007
- IFLA, Statement of International Cataloguing Principles
- David Bade, Structures, standards, and the people who make them meaningful, May 9, 2007
- Diane I. Hillmann, Structures and Standards for Our Bibliographic Future, May 9, 2007 [ppt]
- Alan Danskin, "Tomorrow never knows": the end of cataloguing?, June 6, 2006
- Metadata Services, Cornell University Library
- Chris Oliver, Changing to RDA, 2007
- Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, Cataloging and Metadata Education: A Proposal for Preparing Cataloging Professionals of the 21st Century, April 2003
- On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, January 9, 2008
- Robert Wolven, In Search of a New Model, January 15, 2008
- CPSO, Library of Congress Subject Headings: Pre- vs.Post-Coordination and Related Issues, June 13, 2007
- Thomas Mann, "On the Record" but Off the Track, March 14, 2008
- Karen Coyle and Diane Hillmann, Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging Rules for the 20th Century, January 2007
- Martha M. Yee's home page
- ALA - ALCTS website
- Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access (CC:DA)
- DCMI/RDA Task Group Wiki
- Norm Medeiros, The catalog's last stand, 2007
- Richard Gartner, Metadata for digital libraries: state of the art and future directions, April 2008
- Francis Miksa, The Genius of Library Cataloging and its Possible Future, March 6, 2006 [Audio file]
- Karen Markey, The Online Library Catalog: Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained?, January 2007
Well, I didn't give it a really thorough reading...but the thing I had the biggest problem with in the report, the suspension of RDA, clearly LC is not going to go along with, so I'm ok with the response.
I certainly think RDA seems to have problems, and I don't know that it will be perfect, or the right answer, but I think that it is definitely still worth pursuing.
Posted by: arkham | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 02:21 PM
I agree. I'm behind continued RDA development also. Now that I'm working with mostly non-MARC formats (I'm only working on one project that's using MARCXML and MARC 21) the need for a new content standard is very apparent to me. I have to say that I love AACR2 and I'm sure I'll refer back to it as a reference. AACR2 has a coherent structure and logic to it. I have a particular fondness for my dogeared library school copy of the 1988 revision with penciled in LCRI rule numbers!
Posted by: Chris Schwartz | Wednesday, June 04, 2008 at 02:39 PM